عن اثر مفهوم "البدائية" على الفكر "المحمودي"

Dear all. I thought; and I still think that this post could be made one of the best enlightening posts.o

For brothers, Dr. Haydar and Dr. Ahmad. Could you, please, concentrate on falsifying, refuting and shattering the bases of Usaama's tools of analytic criticism, rather than shelling his background or his ambitions or his personality? I think that the former will be beneficial to us.o

For you, as followers of Mahmood, may be Usaama is sailing the wrong way, but for me he has every right to try his analytic tools wherever he wants, and the believers should prove him wrong. Some other inellectuals have gone much far, to unparalled depths, than Usaama is trying to apply. They consider Quraan itself as a mere Text ( a Textual Tome), and they enjoy laudation from many Muslims: (Muhammad Arkoon is a case in point). I don't think that Usaama is trespassing red lines of a Holy Writ.o

Do I look like defending Usaama in person? No, I am not. I am defending a quite contray sort of belief. A belief in holiness of nothing else, other than in the intact Holy Book of God. And even this Holy Book itself is in no way immune to tampering by some free-hand researchers. If you -Brothers the Jamhooriyeen- agree that M. M. Taha was/is not a God or a Prophet, I will remain astonished why you (Republican Brothers) get soooooo "freaky" when someone talks somehow critical about Al-Fikra, while I haven't seen any Jamhoori getting that freaky when anybody curses Allah, Subhanuhu wa Ta3ala ,and all His Divine Prophets?. I can't get that, because I saw on this board some insults to Allah (SWT), to His Revealed Religions and to all His Glorified Prophets, and I don't remember that I saw a Jamhoori fighting against that. This makes me a bit confused.o

To save my soul, and seek forgiveness from every Jamhoori if I ever offended them here, I don't have any bad intentions of any kind. My prime intention is to ask Dr. Haydar, as a professional academic of Discourse Analysis (and all related press or information thnigs; I don't know how to name that elusive field), I ask him, honestly, to use his academic, professional power in responding to Usaama. Dr. Ahmad Al-Husain too can do much better to enlighten us about how to be simple and easy when one wants to preach a gospel in which he believes.o

A final word. I still believe that Usaama, Dr. Haydar and Dr. Ahmad can educate us in this mysterious field of Discourse and Post-modernist schools of thought. Try to remember that, borthers, many of us (the bulk of us, in fact) know nothing about Structuralism, Post-Structuralism, Modernism, Post-Modernism, Nihilism and even Shinteerism.o

A refreshing Break

you can see how I want to escape reading some books, by capitalizing on your writings, if they are really worth reading.o

A little note: Nihilism is a perfect failure. Shinteerism is my own school; a hedging mechanism in the face of Globalism.0

With respect.o

Shinteer Ibn Ummi Shinteer

(عدل بواسطة Shinteer on 06-25-2004, 07:09 PM)