كشف جديد مذهل....مهد الحضارة المصرية في السودان!" توجد صور

Quote: Witness of the Bible The Bible tells us. ' . . .the sons of Ham [were] Cush, and Mizraim [i.e. Egypt], and Phut, and Canaan. And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtechah.56 Generally speaking all Semitic tradition (Jewish and Arab) classes ancient Egypt with the countries of the blacks. The importance of these depositions cannot be ignored, for these are peoples (the Jews) which lived side by side with the ancient Egyptians and sometimes in symbiosis with them and have nothing to gain by presenting a false ethnic picture of them. Nor is the notion of an erroneous interpretation of the facts any more tenable.57 Cultural Data Among the innumerable identical cultural traits recorded in Egypt and in present-day black Africa, it is proposed to refer only to circumcision and totemism. According to the extract from Herodotus quoted earlier, circumcision is of African origin. Archaeology has confirmed the judgment of the Father of History for Elliott-Smith was able to determine from the examination of well-preserved mummies that circumcision was the rule among the Egyptians as long ago as the protohistoric era,58 i.e. earlier than -4000. Egyptian totemism retained its vitality down to the Roman period59 and Plutarch also mentions it. The researches of Amelineau6,60 Loret, Moret and Adolphe Reinach have clearly demonstrated the existence of an Egyptian totemic system, in refutation of the champions of the zoolatric thesis. If we reduce the notion of the totem to that of a fetish, usually representing an animal of a species with which the tribe believes it has special ties formally renewed at fixed intervals, and which is carried into battle like a standard; if we accept this minimal but adequate definition of a totem, it can be said that there was no country where totemism had a more brilliant reign than in Egypt and certainly nowhere where it could be better studied.61 Linguistic Affinity Walaf,62 a Senegalese language spoken in the extreme west of Africa on the Atlantic Ocean, is perhaps as close to ancient Egyptian as Coptic. An exhaustive study of this question has recently been carried out.63 In this chapter enough is presented to show that the kinship between ancient Egyptian and the languages of Africa is not hypothetical but a demonstrable fact which it is impossible for modern scholarship to thrust aside. As we shall see, the kinship is genealogical in nature. Egyptian Coptic Walaf [hieroglyphics] =kef=to grasp, (Saidique dialect) kef=seize a prey to take a strip keh=to tame 65 (of something)64 PRESENT PRESENT PRESENT kef i keh kef na kef ek keh ek kef nga kef et keh ere kef na kef ef kef ef kef es keh es kef ef na kef es kef n keh en kef nanu kef ton keh etetu kef ngen kef sen keh ey kef nanu PAST PAST PAST kef ni keh nei kef (on) na kef (o) nek keh nek kef (on) nga kef (o) net keh nere kef (on) na kef (o) nef keh nef kef (on) ef na kef (o) nes keh nes kef (on) es kef (o) nen keh nen kef (on) nanu kef (o) n ten keh netsten kef (on) ngen kef (o) n sen67 keh ney68 kef (on) nanu EGYPTIAN WALAF (symbol) =feh=go away feh=rush off We have the following correspondences between the verb forms, with identity of similarity of meaning: all the Egyptian verb forms, except for two, are also recorded in Walaf. EGYPTIAN WALAF feh-ef feh-ef feh-es feh-es feh-n-ef feh-on-ef feh-n-es feh-ones feh-w feh-w feh-wef feh-w-ef feh-w-es feh-w-es feh-w-a-ef feh-il-ef feh-w-n-es feh-w-on-es feh-in-ef feh-il-ef feh-in-es fen-il-es feh-t-ef feh-t-ef feh-t-es feh-es feh-tyfy feh-ati-fy feh-tysy feh-at-ef feh-tw-ef mar-tw-ef feh-tw-es mar-tw-es feh-kw(i) fahi-kw feh-n-tw-ef feh-an-tw-ef feh-a-tw-es feh-an-tw-es feh-y-ef feh-y-ef feh-y-es fey-y-es EGYPTIAN WALAF [symbol] =mer=love mar=lick (symbol) mer-ef mar-ef mer-es mar-es mer-n-el mar-on-ef mer-n-es mar-on-es mer-w mar-w mer-w-ef mar-w-ef mer-w-n-f mar-w-on-ef mer-w-n-es mar-w-on-es mer-in-ef mar-il-ef mer-in-es mar-il-es mer-t-ef mar-t-ef mer-t-es mar-t-es mer-tw-ef mar-tw-ef mer-tw-es mar-tw-es mer-tyfy mar-at-ef mer-t-tysy mar-aty-es mar-aty-s mar-aty-sy mar-kwi mari-kw mer-y-ef mar-y-ef mer-y-es mar-y-es mer-n-tw-ef mar-an-tw-ef mer-n-tw-es mar-antw-es mar-tw-on-ef mar-tw-on-es Egyptian and Walaf Demonstratives There are the following phonetic correspondents between Egyptian and Walaf demonstratives; [This section was omitted because of the difficulty of reproducing the symbols on the Internet] These phonetic correspondences are not ascriable either to elementary affinity or to the general laws of the human mind for they are regular correspondences on outstanding points extending through an entire system, that of the demonstratives in the two languages and that of the verbal languages. It is through the application of such laws that it was possible to demonstrate the existence of the Indo-European linguistic family. The comparison could be carried to show that the majority of the phonemes remain unchanged between the two languages. The few changes which are of great interest are the following: [This section was omitted because of the difficulty of reproducing the symbols on the Internet] It is still early to talk with precision of the vocalic accompaniment of the Egyptian phonemes. But the way is open for the rediscovery of the vocalics of ancient Egyptian from comparative studies with the languages of Africa.